Are we talking about the same Jags that had to come from behind with a last-second field goal after dominating the sans-Willie Parker Steelers last week?
yeah those Jags :-) had slick willie been in there the jags woulda blown it out as the steelers wouldn't have adjusted their game plan against willie's absence. . .
Unless you bet on the Pats you might as well throw your money in the toilet, poop on it, light the poop on fire, pee the fire out, then flush the whole burnt, poopy, peed on mess down the toilet.
They still have to beat the Jags, the Bolts (I'm an optimist) and the Seahawks (You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one). No way thats gonna happen.
My best guess is that Reggie "We-never-bought-a-jersey-for-Mack" Nelson will have anywhere from 7 to 9 picks against Brady. In the first half.
A. The current champs are the current champs because a UoF receiver couldn't handle two perfect third down passes (one a TD) in last year's AFC championship game.
B. Did you watch Randy Moss/Tom Brady this year?
C. Ummmm, did you look at Tom Brady this year? Goddamn he's pretty.
I had to side with the Sidekick here, much as it pains me. (Tom Brady's beauty simply does not make up for his jackassery.) $17, or 17 points in the work pool as is this case, is better than -100.
I did take the Jags to beat the spread (+13.5) today. Hopefully, this is a good balance of the collective wisdom presented here.
10 comments:
If you take post-dated cheques, I want my money on the Jags.
Booo-- YOW!!!
I 2nd that. The toughest game they'd have is the this one coming and hell if they could take out the Patsies, who couldn't they beat?
Are we talking about the same Jags that had to come from behind with a last-second field goal after dominating the sans-Willie Parker Steelers last week?
Packers? They will probably be in the Super Bowl as long as TO has the ankle problem.
yeah those Jags :-) had slick willie been in there the jags woulda blown it out as the steelers wouldn't have adjusted their game plan against willie's absence. . .
tee hee. . .
Unless you bet on the Pats you might as well throw your money in the toilet, poop on it, light the poop on fire, pee the fire out, then flush the whole burnt, poopy, peed on mess down the toilet.
They still have to beat the Jags, the Bolts (I'm an optimist) and the Seahawks (You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one).
No way thats gonna happen.
My best guess is that Reggie "We-never-bought-a-jersey-for-Mack" Nelson will have anywhere from 7 to 9 picks against Brady. In the first half.
Listen, why doesn't everyone keep sleeping on the current champions. Go ahead keep snoring away.
A. The current champs are the current champs because a UoF receiver couldn't handle two perfect third down passes (one a TD) in last year's AFC championship game.
B. Did you watch Randy Moss/Tom Brady this year?
C. Ummmm, did you look at Tom Brady this year? Goddamn he's pretty.
I had to side with the Sidekick here, much as it pains me. (Tom Brady's beauty simply does not make up for his jackassery.) $17, or 17 points in the work pool as is this case, is better than -100.
I did take the Jags to beat the spread (+13.5) today. Hopefully, this is a good balance of the collective wisdom presented here.
Post a Comment